| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. Please PLEASE acknowledge this bug ..... this is serious for WH'... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In that direction.. I swapped ships, than started fitting service... Fitting screen shows no modules Swapped back, opened fitting service... Fitting screen shows no modules Swapped again, opened fitting service... All normal... phew.. Bug reporte...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.06 09:38:28
|
2. Sticky:Dev Blog: EVE Economy Update - EVE Vegas 2015 Report - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: The economic devotee in me hopes that, in the not so distant future, all items in EVE Online will be player made and tradeable, including blueprints, skills, and skillpoints. There is a lot to be considered, discussed, and ad...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 16:52:07
|
3. *** New ship idea *** Mineral Venture - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Felsusguy wrote: Lim Hiaret wrote: I think you should try the Miasmos. Also the blue skin is already used for the new Endurance. The Miasmos is for ore. The Kryos is for minerals. Jep, mixed them up... sry.
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 10:20:08
|
4. Nullsec Capital Anomaly - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arczi Lazair That should be fixed!
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 10:08:42
|
5. New Probe scanner - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dr. Evil air quoted: "Constructive feedback" Please bring back the checkbox to filter anomalies on the top of the probe window. Please bring back the checkbox to turn off filtering on the top of the Dscan window. End of "Constructive feedback"...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 10:05:44
|
6. Nullsec Capital Anomaly - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
These anomalies already exist. You find them under the ore category. Just don't forget to fit mining lasers onto your titan. Chribba should have some good fits for you...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 09:59:38
|
7. *** New ship idea *** Mineral Venture - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think you should try the Miasmos. Also the blue skin is already used for the new Endurance.
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 09:49:19
|
8. Fixing high sec war decs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
afkalt wrote: I'm giving this 7-10 pages of mud slinging before ISD rock up and lock it. Again . Perhaps another candidate for a sticky. Maybe we just just have a new subforum called "circular arguments" and be done with it. Maybe we nee...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.11.05 09:44:57
|
9. PvE changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Will we see kill missions against other capsuleers? Like a faction handing out kill mission against capsuleers that droped their standing to abysmal. This could even include kill rights, bribed from a corrupt CONCORD official.
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.29 09:47:10
|
10. Sticky:[New Structures] Condensed thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: Citadels in wormhole spaces do not benefit from asset safety. All items are lost when the structure is destroyed there.
I'm fine with the term destroyed, but don't let it drop as loot. Otherwise WH citadels will ...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.29 09:28:12
|
11. Feature polling - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Some sort of a poll support in the forums would be nice, but I would not enforce it on login. People would just get mad at you.
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.19 15:45:04
|
12. [forums][website] Comunication paltform for controversial toppics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Funny that you mention it because CCP didnGÇÖt bother with that one. Besides, my point is not the current discussion about SP buying because I realy couldnGÇÖt bother less. My point is that a discussion on 180++ pages in a forum thread is dumb. It...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.19 15:12:07
|
13. [forums][website] Comunication paltform for controversial toppics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I would like to suggest a new communication platform for controversial topics like the whole SP thingy. A Devblog is not optimal because it gives the whole thing a very "we are going toGǪ" flavour. FAID might not be the best place either, but at ...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.19 09:08:24
|
14. Sticky:Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If this is going to be implemented, there needs to be a way to find out how many SP a character actually has. Not the exact number, but at least a range should be visible. This will be a bit embarrassing.
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.19 08:27:35
|
15. Sticky:[Chronicle] - Testament - in EVE Fiction [original thread]
My best guess... Every Man Should Stand Equal Before the Law Arnold Bertonneau, 1864
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.16 15:11:27
|
16. Sticky:Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_gap Eve is dying, eve is dying, yeah yeah yeah, eve is dying... Now I'm against it But Eve is dying, eve is dying, yeah yeah yeah, eve is dying... Also free gold plated dominix for vets only, rainbow co...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.16 10:08:26
|
17. Minelayers to the battlefield! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Its friday... Mines should have the following parameters: HP Damage Explosion radius Explosion velocity Activation radius Activation delay Activation energy/weight Deployment time Deployment minimum distance Life time System security restriction...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.16 09:50:46
|
18. Sticky:Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Wow! What a spook. Halloweeen coming early this year?
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.16 09:40:09
|
19. [New structures] Defence mechanism GÇô pro Automated defence - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
WH space is very different from 0.0, low- or highsec. That is actually a different issue with the new structures. I'm not even sure if the current model would fit into WH at all. Personally I would like to see structures that specifically fit to t...
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.15 16:13:02
|
20. [New structures] Defence mechanism GÇô pro Automated defence - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yes you could have services, markets and such. But with the exception of highsec, I doubt that people will open their citadels to others.
- by Lim Hiaret - at 2015.10.14 14:03:36
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |